<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outlook 2007: Auto-assign categories on outgoing replies and forwards based on original message</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379</link>
	<description>You are now crossing a live runway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:43:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: realhomero</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-29935</link>
		<dc:creator>realhomero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-29935</guid>
		<description>Five stars for you! I was getting crazy painting every mail that I sent.

Thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five stars for you! I was getting crazy painting every mail that I sent.</p>
<p>Thanks a lot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bletchley</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-29820</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bletchley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-29820</guid>
		<description>This may be the best technical post I have ever found.  Thank you so much for solving and sharing the solution to a problem that was really vexing.  Your fix worked perfectly.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may be the best technical post I have ever found.  Thank you so much for solving and sharing the solution to a problem that was really vexing.  Your fix worked perfectly.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chaudhary Muhammad Asim</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-26689</link>
		<dc:creator>Chaudhary Muhammad Asim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-26689</guid>
		<description>dear pingu,

i have this registry edit and works absolutely fine with me, there is only a compatibility issue between office 2007 and 2010 or any other different version of office. works very well with in the same version.

regards,
Asim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear pingu,</p>
<p>i have this registry edit and works absolutely fine with me, there is only a compatibility issue between office 2007 and 2010 or any other different version of office. works very well with in the same version.</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Asim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-24361</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-24361</guid>
		<description>Thank you.  This was really bugging as i got used to it with outlook 2003.  Your solution worked like a charm.  
curious...  how did you figure it out?  and why did Microsoft disable it in 2007?

thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  This was really bugging as i got used to it with outlook 2003.  Your solution worked like a charm.<br />
curious&#8230;  how did you figure it out?  and why did Microsoft disable it in 2007?</p>
<p>thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Medford</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-11306</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Medford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-11306</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this. It worked like a charm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this. It worked like a charm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chung</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-5772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 18:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-5772</guid>
		<description>Jürgen,

THANKS for researching and writing about this tip. Automatic ategory removal was the primary &quot;feature&quot; that has kept my inbox uncategorized for the past year. ;-)

I really hate that MS-ware never provides GUI settings for the useful tweaks like this. Instead MS forces people to hack their registry, which opens up other cans of worms.

Here&#039;s another blog entry I found with a systematic solution (with or without VBA) to GTD your inbox to zero.
http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2006/06/04/617343.aspx

Cheers,

-Tony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jürgen,</p>
<p>THANKS for researching and writing about this tip. Automatic ategory removal was the primary &#8220;feature&#8221; that has kept my inbox uncategorized for the past year. <img src='http://www.juergentreml.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I really hate that MS-ware never provides GUI settings for the useful tweaks like this. Instead MS forces people to hack their registry, which opens up other cans of worms.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another blog entry I found with a systematic solution (with or without VBA) to GTD your inbox to zero.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2006/06/04/617343.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/smguest/archive/2006/06/04/617343.aspx</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-Tony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jürgen</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-3539</link>
		<dc:creator>Jürgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-3539</guid>
		<description>Hi,

it&#039;s been quite a while since I investigated this topic, so I cannot guarantee that the following is 100% correct.

As far as I remember, using custom rules was one of the first options I tried by then and as you stated correctly, it can be used to assign a specific category but there&#039;s no way to tell it to assign the same category the original mail had. At least, I didn&#039;t find a way to do so. 

I finally solved the problem the way described in my post above. At least I thought so, but I must admit, I didn&#039;t know that categories will also be transmitted to the recipient along with the mail itself, something I&#039;m honestly not too fond of. But anyway, thanks for the info and the link!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>it&#8217;s been quite a while since I investigated this topic, so I cannot guarantee that the following is 100% correct.</p>
<p>As far as I remember, using custom rules was one of the first options I tried by then and as you stated correctly, it can be used to assign a specific category but there&#8217;s no way to tell it to assign the same category the original mail had. At least, I didn&#8217;t find a way to do so. </p>
<p>I finally solved the problem the way described in my post above. At least I thought so, but I must admit, I didn&#8217;t know that categories will also be transmitted to the recipient along with the mail itself, something I&#8217;m honestly not too fond of. But anyway, thanks for the info and the link!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>Hi

Could a rule with a custom action be used to apply the category to the sent item?

In Outlook rules, you can apply a category to sent items, though it only gives you the option to choose a specific one for the rule.

However there is a &quot;perform a custom action&quot; action in the wizard. I have no idea how to do anything with it, but I have a feeling that it could apply categories to sent items.

The reason I query a different method to changing the registry key is that using the registry fix means the recipient of your email will also receive your category. See the note on this page: http://www.msoutlook.info/question/41
Which could be undesirable in some situations.

all the best
Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>Could a rule with a custom action be used to apply the category to the sent item?</p>
<p>In Outlook rules, you can apply a category to sent items, though it only gives you the option to choose a specific one for the rule.</p>
<p>However there is a &#8220;perform a custom action&#8221; action in the wizard. I have no idea how to do anything with it, but I have a feeling that it could apply categories to sent items.</p>
<p>The reason I query a different method to changing the registry key is that using the registry fix means the recipient of your email will also receive your category. See the note on this page: <a href="http://www.msoutlook.info/question/41" rel="nofollow">http://www.msoutlook.info/question/41</a><br />
Which could be undesirable in some situations.</p>
<p>all the best<br />
Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jürgen</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-1843</link>
		<dc:creator>Jürgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-1843</guid>
		<description>Yep, you&#039;re right so far. A rule of this kind should get you what you&#039;re looking for.

Anyway, there&#039;s a few glitches with this:
1) You&#039;&#039; end up with a copy of every sent message in your inbox as well as another one in your sent items folder. So make sure to deactivate &quot;save copies of messages in sent items folder&quot; under tools -&gt; options.

2) As far as I remember, the rule above doesn&#039;t take care of replies and forwards in folders other then the inbox folder. So you should also activate the &quot;in folders other than the inbox, save replies with original message&quot; option.

Finally, remove the &quot;except if sent to my_email&quot; part. It&#039;s unnecessary :)

Btw: Most of this info comes from a blog post a came across some time ago which can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2007/10/05/ultimate-inbox-merging-inbox-and-sent-items-folders.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, you&#8217;re right so far. A rule of this kind should get you what you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s a few glitches with this:<br />
1) You&#8221; end up with a copy of every sent message in your inbox as well as another one in your sent items folder. So make sure to deactivate &#8220;save copies of messages in sent items folder&#8221; under tools -> options.</p>
<p>2) As far as I remember, the rule above doesn&#8217;t take care of replies and forwards in folders other then the inbox folder. So you should also activate the &#8220;in folders other than the inbox, save replies with original message&#8221; option.</p>
<p>Finally, remove the &#8220;except if sent to my_email&#8221; part. It&#8217;s unnecessary <img src='http://www.juergentreml.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Btw: Most of this info comes from a blog post a came across some time ago which can be found <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2007/10/05/ultimate-inbox-merging-inbox-and-sent-items-folders.aspx" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pingu</title>
		<link>http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Pingu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juergentreml.de/archives/379#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>The exception seems to be mangled, it should read :

except if send to my_email”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exception seems to be mangled, it should read :</p>
<p>except if send to my_email”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
